(Neformalno) sistemsko razmišljanje kot podlaga (uspeha) civilne družbe /
Civilno družbo sestavljajo občani in njihove organizacije, ki delujejo mimo in kot dopolnilo državne in druge prisile. So sestavni del demokracije, katere bistvo je v tem, da prispeva k doseganju celovitosti in aktiviranju ustvarjalnosti mnogih, ker so drug drugemu potrebni, soodvisni. Žal sedanja s...
Shranjeno v:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Book Chapter |
Jezik: | Slovenian |
Teme: | |
Sorodne knjige/članki: | Vsebovano v:
Civilna družba v Sloveniji in Evropi |
Oznake: |
Označite
Brez oznak, prvi označite!
|
Izvleček: | Civilno družbo sestavljajo občani in njihove organizacije, ki delujejo mimo in kot dopolnilo državne in druge prisile. So sestavni del demokracije, katere bistvo je v tem, da prispeva k doseganju celovitosti in aktiviranju ustvarjalnosti mnogih, ker so drug drugemu potrebni, soodvisni. Žal sedanja slovenska praksa delovanja civilne družbe ne daje vtisa, da se njene sestavine zavedajo svoje soodvisnosti in razvijajo etiko in prakso soodvisnosti. To bi bilo lažje doseči, če bi se bolj uveljavilo (neformalno) sistemsko (=celovito) razmišljanje. Tako bi se nujna specializacija in z njo redukcija celote na dele več ne postavljala kot nasprotje celovitosti, ampak bi jo štela za dopolnilo, ki je enako nujno. Seveda ne moremo zahtevati popolne celovitosti, zadovoljiti pa se tudi ne smemo z zgolj navidezno, ampak upoštevati "zakon potrebne celovitosti". Primer uvajanja gibanja civilne družbe "Slovenija - inovativna družba" v zadnjih letih ni uspel, morda tudi zato ne, ker se soodvisnost in zakon potrebne celovitosti nista zmogla uveljaviti. Civil society is made of citizens and their organizations working independently of and complementary to the governmental and other imposing. They are a part of democracy, the essense of which is a contribution to attainment of holism and activating of creativity of many, because they mutually need each other, they are interdependent. Unfortunately, the current Slovenian practice of working of the civil society does not make the impression that its components are aware of their interdependence and developing their ethics and practice of interdependence. This would be easier to attain with asserting more of an (informal) systems (=holistic) thinking. Thus, the unavoidable specialization, and its consequence, i.e. the reduction of the whole to its parts, would no longer be opposed to holism, but would rather see their complementarity of two equally needed attributes. Of course, no total holism can be demanded, neither can a fictitious holism be found sufficient, we must consider the "law of requisite holism". The case of making of a civil society movememnt "Slovenia - an innovative society" did not succeed, in recent years. The reason for this failure might also be the fact that interdependence and the law of requisite holism have not been considered sufficiently. |
---|---|
Fizični opis: | Str. 43-52. |
ISBN: | 9612350094 |