In the court we trust : cooperation, coordination and collaboration between the ECJ and supreme administrative courts /
Shranjeno v:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Knjiga |
| Jezik: | English |
| Izdano: |
Cambridge :
Cambridge University Press,
2019.
|
| Serija: | Cambridge studies in European law and policy
|
| Teme: | |
| Oznake: |
Označite
Brez oznak, prvi označite!
|
| LEADER | 04338nam a2200301 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 513859960 | ||
| 003 | SI-MaCOB | ||
| 005 | 20201122000000.0 | ||
| 008 | 200226s2019 xxka f| |||1 ||eng c | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108481274 | ||
| 080 | |a 342 |2 UDCMRF12 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gestel, Rob van. |4 aut |0 (SI-MaCOB)215752291 | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a In the court we trust : |b cooperation, coordination and collaboration between the ECJ and supreme administrative courts / |c Rob van Gestel, Jurgen de Poorter. |
| 246 | 3 | |a Cooperation, coordination and collaboration between the European Court of Justice and supreme administrative courts | |
| 260 | |a Cambridge : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2019. | ||
| 300 | |a XVII, 240 str. : |b graf. prikazi ; |c 24 cm. | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Cambridge studies in European law and policy | |
| 504 | |a Bibliografija z opombami na dnu str. | ||
| 504 | |a Kazalo. | ||
| 504 | |a Kazalo. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Cover -- Half-title -- Series information -- Title page -- Copyright information -- Dedication -- Contents -- List of Figures -- Series Editors' Preface -- Preface -- 1 Why Don't We Talk? -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 Focus on Supreme Administrative Courts -- 1.3 Dialogue Before, During and After the CJEU Decides -- 1.3.1 Dialogue Before Raising a Question -- 1.3.2 Dialogue During the Procedure Before the CJEU -- 1.3.3 Dialogue After the CJEU Has Ruled -- 1.4 Dialogue: Problem or Solution? -- 1.5 Checks and Balances in the Dialogue? -- 1.6 Why the CJEU Might Also Benefit from a Judicial Dialogue -- 1.7 Scientific Relevance -- 1.8 Outline and Approach -- 2 Dialogue as a Concept -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 The Origins of the Dialogue Concept: Constitutional Conversations between Courts and Legislatures -- 2.3 The Purpose(s) of a Judicial Dialogue -- 2.4 Dialogues Between Courts: A Typology of Different Forms and Functions -- 2.4.1 Vertical Dialogues -- 2.4.2 Semi-Vertical Dialogues -- 2.4.3 Dialogues in Overlapping or Competing Jurisdictions -- 2.4.4 Dialogues Between Courts at the Same Level -- 2.4.5 The Dialogue Between Constitutional Courts and Supranational Courts -- 2.5 What Have We Learned? -- 2.6 Where Does the Preliminary Reference Procedure Fit In? -- 2.7 Future Challenges: The CJEU's Caseload -- 2.8 Conclusion -- 3 Case Law Analysis -- 3.1 Purpose of the Case Law Analysis -- 3.2 Research Design -- 3.2.1 The Sample -- 3.2.2 Does the Preliminary Question Invite a Response? -- 3.2.3 Gauweiler: Example of an Attempt to Dictate the Outcome of a Preliminary Ruling -- 3.2.4 Open or Closed Questions: A Matter of Trust? -- 3.2.5 Compatibility Questions -- 3.2.6 Linking Preliminary Questions to Provisional Answers from the Referring Court -- 3.3 What Does the Case Law Show Regarding Open, Binary and Compatibility Questions? -- 3.3.1 Binary or Open Questions? -- 3.3.2 Questions that Should Not Be Asked: Compatibility of National Law with EU Law -- 3.3.3 Provisional Answers -- 3.3.3.1 How Frequently Are Provisional Answers Being Offered? -- 3.3.3.2 Different Styles of Provisional Answers -- 3.4 How Does the CJEU Respond: What Sort of Answers Does It Provide? -- 3.4.1 Reformulating Preliminary Questions -- 3.4.2 The Case of Trijber and Harmsen: An Example of an Unsuccessful Interpretation of the Preliminary Question -- 3.4.3 Request for Clarification -- 3.4.4 Different Types of Answers From the CJEU -- 3.4.5 A Case Law Analysis into the Different Types of Responses by the CJEU -- 3.4.5.1 The CJEU's Response to Binary Questions -- 3.4.5.2 The CJEU's Response to Compliance Questions -- 3.4.5.3 The CJEU's Response to (Partly) Open Questions -- 3.4.6 The Responsiveness of The CJEU to Provisional Answers -- 3.5 Implementing the Decision of the CJEU -- 3.6 Conclusions -- 4 Results from the Interviews -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Interview Methodology -- 4.2.1 Individual, Semi-Structured and In-Depth Interviews. | |
| 610 | 2 | 0 | |a Court of Justice (Court of Justice of the European Union). |
| 650 | 0 | 0 | |a International and municipal law |z European Union countries. |
| 650 | 0 | 0 | |a Administrative courts |z European Union countries. |
| 650 | 0 | 0 | |a Jurisdiction |z European Union countries. |
| 653 | 0 | |a Upravno sodišče |a Sodišče Evropske unije |a postopek predhodnega odločanja |a nacionalna sodišča | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Poorter, Jurgen de. |4 aut |0 (SI-MaCOB)339287139 | |
| 040 | |a USRS |b slv |c SI-MaIIZ |d PRFMB |e ppiak | ||